Sunday, April 14, 2019

Caltex (Phils.) Inc. v IAC

G.R. No. 72703 November 13, 1992
Art. 1253 – Payment shall be applied to interest first

Facts:
·          Asia Pacific Airways entered into an agreement with petitioner Caltex, whereby petitioner agreed to supply respondent's aviation fuel requirements for 2 years.
·          When respondent had an outstanding obligation to petitioner, it executed a Deed of Assignment over its receivables or refunds of Special Fund Import Payments from National Treasury of the Philippines to be applied as payment.
·          The refund was then issued, but the amount remitted to petitioner exceeded the amount covered by the Deed of Assignment.
·          Asia Pacific demanded the refund of the remaining amount. Caltex refused because the exceeded amount served as interest and service charges at the rate of 18% per annum on the unpaid and overdue account.
·          RTC Manila dismissed the complaint, but reversed by the IAC.

Issue:
WoN the Deed of Assignment constituted dacion en pago so that the obligation is totally extinguished and no interest and service charges could anymore be imposed on the respondent.

Held:
            No, the Court holds that they did not intend the Deed of Assignment to have the effect of totally extinguishing the obligations of respondent without payment of the applicable interest charges on the overdue account.
            Art. 1253, Civil Code provides that "if the debt produces interest, payment of the principal shall not be deemed to have been made until the interests have been covered."
In the instant case, the payment of applicable interest charges on overdue account, separate from the principal obligation was expressly stipulated in the Deed of Assignment as it speaks of three (3) obligations — (1) the outstanding obligation of P4,072,682.13; (2) the applicable interest charges on overdue accounts; and (3) the other avturbo fuel lifting and deliveries that assignor (respondent) may from time to time receive from assignee (petitioner).
           Thus, IAC decision is set aside and RTC decision is reinstated.

No comments:

Post a Comment